Cases 141 - 150 of 1,650
MONTGOMERY v. MAIN LINE HEALTH, INC.
as 2:2023cv01446
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
MAIN LINE HEALTH, INC. doing business as RIDDLE HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Lloyd v. Keystone Forging Company
as 4:2023cv00554
Plaintiff:
Nathan Lloyd
Defendant:
Keystone Forging Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
ORFI v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01698
Plaintiff:
JAQUAD ORFI and JAOUAD ORFI
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC, JOHN DOES #1-10 (FICTITIOUS NAMES), ABC COMPANIES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
OLAVARRIA v. CARE ONE AT TRINITAS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LLC
as 2:2023cv01437
Plaintiff:
SARITA OLAVARRIA
Defendant:
CARE ONE AT TRINITAS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Hess v. Township of Saint Thomas et al
as 1:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
Dale A. Hess
Defendant:
Township of Saint Thomas, Saint Thomas Township Municipal Authority, Travis Amsley and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
LOWERY v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LOWERY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
ARNOTT v. MINDOULA HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02217
Plaintiff:
MELISSA ARNOTT
Defendant:
MINDOULA HEALTH, INC., ABC CORPORATIONS 1-5 (FICTITIOUS NAMES DESCRIBING PRESENTLY UNIDENTIFED BUSINESS ENTITIES), JOHN DOES 1-5 (FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNIDENTIFIED INDIVIDUALS) and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Boyer v. UNFI Wholesale Inc.
as 1:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Timothy Boyer
Defendant:
UNFI Wholesale Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
WALKER v. CHESTER COUNTY POCOPSON HOME
as 2:2023cv00687
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY WALKER
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY POCOPSON HOME and COUNTY OF CHESTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
