Cases 51 - 60 of 1,385
LAMONT v. KENCO ENGINEERING, INC
as 2:2023cv01680
Plaintiff:
CLIFF LAMONT
Defendant:
KENCO ENGINEERING, INC doing business as KENCO WEAR PARTS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Brooks v. NVK Logistrics, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01556
Plaintiff:
Danielle A. Brooks
Defendant:
NVK Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PUGH v. VALMONT INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2023cv01520
Plaintiff:
RONALD PUGH
Defendant:
VALMONT INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
COTTON v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 1:2023cv04953
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH COTTON
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
GRIFFITH v. DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv01319
Plaintiff:
MELISSA M. GRIFFITH
Defendant:
DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION and DOLGENCORP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
PERRY et al v. LEE et al
as 3:2019cv17899
Defendant:
MICHELLE LEE, MIRANDA ODJIDJA, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
LARISA PERRY, LOUIS CARDACE, STEVEN COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Michael Easterday v. USPACK Logistics LLC
as 22-1749
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL EASTERDAY, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
USPACK LOGISTICS LLC
PICKHOLZ v. TRANSPARENTBUSINESS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02504
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PICKHOLZ
Defendant:
TRANSPARENTBUSINESS, INC. and ALEXANDRE KONANYKHIN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
SPADY v. ROSS STORES, INC.
as 2:2023cv03010
Plaintiff:
Rashiek Spady
Defendant:
ROSS STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. POLMAX CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv04111
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Defendant:
POLMAX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
