Cases 1 - 10 of 1,385
MANSOUR et al v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2024cv06178
Plaintiff:
Norhan Mansour and Omar Polanco
Defendant:
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Mayor STEVEN M. FULOP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
SEELYE v. AOG, LLC
as 2:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
James Seelye
Defendant:
AOG, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Heino v. SAC Wireless, LLC
as 2:2024cv02009
Plaintiff:
Jacob Heino
Defendant:
SAC Wireless, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
VOREL v. SALKOVITZ et al
as 2:2024cv05933
Plaintiff:
AINSLIE H. VOREL
Defendant:
MARC SALKOVITZ and PAMELA SALKOVITZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Candice Gair, et al v. SV Wind-Down Corporation, et al
as 24-1395
Plaintiff:
CANDICE GAIR, on behalf of herself and all others similarlysituated and RACHAEL BERRY
Defendant:
SV WIND-DOWN CORP, FKA Shop Vac Corp and GREAT STAR TOOLS, USA, Inc
Brian Taylor v. CDS Advantage Solutions, et al
as 24-1806
Plaintiff:
BRIAN L. TAYLOR
Defendant:
CDS ADVANTAGE SOLUTIONS and MARC SULLIVAN
MARTIN v. METEM- A GE POWER BUSINESS et al
as 2:2024cv05648
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MARTIN
Defendant:
METEM- A GE POWER BUSINESS, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
KIM v. BNP MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 2:2024cv05443
Plaintiff:
YEON HEE KIM
Defendant:
BNP MANAGEMENT LLC and JASON PARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Spenillo v. Cleveland-Cliffs Monessen Coke LLC
as 2:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Joseph Spenillo
Defendant:
Cleveland-Cliffs Monessen Coke LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
DE JESUS v. ADT LLC
as 2:2024cv01202
Plaintiff:
CARLOS DE JESUS
Defendant:
ADT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
