Cases 61 - 70 of 1,973
TEAMSTERS INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND BY ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES v. PISCITELLI
as 2:2023cv06096
Plaintiff:
TEAMSTERS INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND BY ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Defendant:
EMILIA PISCITELLI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE BENEFIT PENSION FUND et al v. C GEYER CONSTRUCTION SERVICES. INC.
as 2:2023cv02979
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE BENEFIT PENSION FUND, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant:
C GEYER CONSTRUCTION SERVICES. INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
BAKERY DRIVERS AND SALESMEN LOCAL 194 AND INDUSTRY PENSION FUNDS BY ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES v. HALL
as 2:2023cv04128
Plaintiff:
BAKERY DRIVERS AND SALESMEN LOCAL 194 AND INDUSTRY PENSION FUNDS BY ITS BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Defendant:
KEITH HALL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. MAXIM HYDRAULICS INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02946
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY HEALTH BENEFIT FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM and others
Defendant:
MAXIM HYDRAULICS INC. and MAX WASSEF
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. IES, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02925
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL PLAN and others
Defendant:
IES, LLC, WOLFE CLARK, RAYMOND KUNTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
N.E.C.A. Local Union No. 313 I.B.E.W. Health and Welfare Fund et al v. KAM Electric, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00800
Plaintiff:
N.E.C.A. Local Union No. 313 I.B.E.W. Health and Welfare Fund, N.E.C.A. Local Union No. 313 I.B.E.W. Pension Fund, N.E.C.A. Local Union No. 313 I.B.E.W. Deferred Income Plan and others
Defendant:
KAM Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. PURE GLASS LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03857
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES ANNUITY PLAN, TERRY NELSON and others
Defendant:
PURE GLASS LLC and MATTHEW M. STAFFORD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. IMPACT STOREFRONT DESIGNS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv03581
Plaintiff:
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE, INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES ANNUITY PLAN and others
Defendant:
IMPACT STOREFRONT DESIGNS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY and MICHAEL P. MASTERSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
I.U.O.E. LOCAL 68 PENSION FUND et al v. HIGHGATE HOTELS, LP
as 2:2023cv03589
Plaintiff:
IUOE LOCAL 68 PENSION FUND, I.U.O.E. LOCAL 68 PENSION FUND and MICHAEL MCGLYNN
Defendant:
HIGHGATE HOTELS LP and HIGHGATE HOTELS, LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Board of Trustees Plumbers and Pipefitters Local, et al v. Jones Lang Lasalle Americas Inc
as 23-2202
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO 74 PENSION FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO 74 ANNUITY FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO 74 WELFARE FUND and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
