Cases 1 - 10 of 336
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. NOMIDES et al
as 2:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, DANIEL R. WILLIAMS and I.U.P.A.T. DISTRICT COUNCIL #57 COMBINED FUNDS ON BEHALF OF THE TRUSTEES OF THE I.U.P.A.T. WELFARE FUND OF WESTERN PA AND THE I.U.P.A.T. WESTERN PA ANNUITY FUND AND
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER C. NOMIDES i/a/t/d/b/a CRT Enterprises and THOMAS NOMIDES i/a/t/d/b/a CRT ENTERPRISES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451 E.R.I.S.A.
Adrienne Arrington et al v. H.I.G. Capital Management LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Arrington, Alecia Guarneros, Alexa Sanchez and others
Defendant:
H.I.G. Capital Management LLC, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
SANTARELLI v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
NINO C. SANTARELLI
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TRUSTEES AND FIDUCIARIES OF THE IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL (PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY) BENEFIT AND PENSION PLANS et al v. PENN UNION FENCE & IRONWORKS et al
as 2:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES AND FIDUCIARIES OF THE IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL (PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY) BENEFIT AND PENSION PLANS, IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL (PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY) BENEFIT PLAN, IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL (PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY), INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL, AND REINFORCING IRONWORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 399 ANNUITY FUND and others
Defendant:
PENN UNION FENCE & IRONWORKS and CHRISTOPHER CARUSO c/o Penn Union Fence & Ironworks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
DANKO et al v. BALTIMORE STEEL ERECTION, LLC. et al
as 2:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DANKO and DANIELLE L. HARSHMAN
Defendant:
BALTIMORE STEEL ERECTION, LLC., CHARLES J. MOST, JR., DUSTIN C. MORGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
STEVE C. et al v. CIGNA Health and Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Steven C. and A. C.
Defendant:
CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, MARLABS INC., Mindtree Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
TRUSTEES AND FIDUCIARIES OF THE IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL (PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY) BENEFIT AND PENSION PLANS et al v. NORTHERN VALLEY ERECTORS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv05159
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES AND FIDUCIARIES OF THE IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL (PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY) BENEFIT AND PENSION PLANS, IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL (PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY) PENSION PLAN, IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL (PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY) BENEFIT PLAN and others
Defendant:
NORTHERN VALLEY ERECTORS, INC., JAMES C STIBITZ and KRISTINA PAPPANO-STIBITZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
TRUSTEES AND FIDUCIARIES OF THE IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL (PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY) BENEFIT AND PENSION PLANS et al v. NORTHERN VALLEY ERECTORS, INC. et al
as 5:2023cv05159
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES AND FIDUCIARIES OF THE IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL (PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY) BENEFIT AND PENSION PLANS, IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL (PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY) PENSION PLAN, IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL (PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY) BENEFIT PLAN and others
Defendant:
NORTHERN VALLEY ERECTORS, INC., JAMES C STIBITZ and KRISTINA PAPPANO-STIBITZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Roland Anderson v. General Motors LLC
as 23-3107
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROLAND C. ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA v. INSULATION COATINGS & CONSULTANTS, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01865
Plaintiff:
LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
INSULATION COATINGS & CONSULTANTS, LLC, CHARLES C. SORCE and INSULATION COATINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
