Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
MEINDL v. WILLIS TOWERS WATSON U.S. BENEFIT PLANS ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE et al
as 2:2022cv02710
Plaintiff: GAIL MEINDL
Defendant: WILLIS TOWERS WATSON U.S. BENEFIT PLANS ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE and WILLIS NORTH AMERICA, INC. PENSION PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Hitchens v. Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 74 Pension Fund We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01206
Plaintiff: Willis Franklin Hitchens
Defendant: Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 74 Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
John Dowling v. Pension Plan for Salaried Empl, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1977
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN E. DOWLING
Defendant - Appellee: PENSION PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES OF UNION PACIFIC CORP AND AFFILLIATES, ROY SCHROER, NAMED FIDUCIARY-PLAN ADMINISTRATION OF THE PENSION PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES OF UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION AND ITS AFFILIATES, EDWIN A. WILLIS, DELEGATE OF THE NAMED FIDUCIARY-PLAN ADMINISTRATION OF THE PENSION PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES OF UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION AND AFFILIATES and others
DOWLING v. PENSION PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES OF UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION AND AFFILIATES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv03926
Plaintiff: JOHN E. DOWLING
Defendant: PENSION PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES OF UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION AND AFFILIATES, ROY SCHROER, EDWIN A. WILLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. SECKINGER et al
as 2:2012cv00744
Plaintiff: THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BLDG. AND CONSTRUCTION HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant: STEVE SECKINGER and CRI RESTORATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. DAVID PRICE et al
as 2:2012cv00340
Plaintiff: THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BLDG. AND CONSTRUCTION HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant: DAVID PRICE and RIGHT PRICE CLEANING
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
AVNET et al v. ABBOTT SEVERANCE PAY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF KOS
as 3:2011cv07438
Plaintiff: ROBERT AVNET , BRENDA BENNETT , GINA BIGLIONE and others
Defendant: ABBOTT SEVERANCE PAY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF KOS PHARMACEUTICALS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. FERRELL et al
as 2:2011cv03561
Plaintiff: THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BLDG. AND CONSTRUCTION HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant: NOEL C. FERRELL and J.W. FERRELL CONCRETE CO.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. BURKE et al
as 2:2011cv02043
Plaintiff: THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BLDG. AND CONSTRUCTION HEALTH AND WELARE FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant: JUDY BURKE and J.R. BURKE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. MONTEIRO et al
as 2:2010cv07311
Plaintiff: THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BLDG. AND CONSTRUCTION HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant: JORGE MONTEIRO and EAST ATLANTIC CONCRETE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?