Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Philips v. Xos, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Mary Philips
Defendant:
Xos, Inc., Dakota Semler, George N. Mattson and others
Moore v. Xos, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jon Moore
Defendant:
Xos, Inc., Dakota Semler, George N. Mattson and others
Hamilton v. SP Plus Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hamilton
Defendant:
SP Plus Corporation, Marc Baumann, Alice Peterson and others
Moore v. SP Plus Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Jon Moore
Defendant:
SP Plus Corporation, Marc Baumann, Alice Peterson and others
Johnson v. Natus Medical Incorporated et al
as 1:2022cv00795
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Natus Medical Incorporated, Joshua H. Levine, Thomas J. Sullivan and others
McNeil v. West Marine, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01036
Plaintiff:
Derrick McNeil
Defendant:
West Marine, Inc. , Matthew L. Hyde , Barbara L. Rambo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
SCHWARTZMAN v. CHURCH OF THE APOSTOLIC FAITH et al
as 2:2011cv01764
Defendant:
SHILOH OUTREACH CHURCH OF THE APOSTOLIC FAITH, ROBERT STINSON, SR. and ALICE STINSON
Plaintiff:
KAMIAN SCHWARTZMAN, IN HIS CAPACITY AS RECEIVER FOR ROBERT STINSON, JR.; LIFE'S GOOD, INC.; LIFE'S GOOD S.T.A.B.L. MORTGAGE FUND, LLC; LIFE'S GOOD HIGH YIELD MORTGAGE FUND, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
IN RE: VONAGE INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING (IPO) SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 3:2007cv00177
Movant:
THE DIRECTED SHARE GROUP and THE DIRECTED SHARE GROUP
Plaintiff:
KEVIN GIBBONS, DOUGLAS M. WERMAN, MARC WEINBERG and others
Defendant:
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP., VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP., JEFFREY A. CITRON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
ELOVITZ v. DQE, INC., et al
as 2:2001cv01851
Plaintiff:
SHELLY W. ELOVITZ, John C. Hynes, Anton Klaver and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
JAMES RICHARDS, JERRY RICHARDSON, WILLIAM STEINER and others
Defendant:
DQE, INC. and DAVID D. MARSHALL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
