Cases 1 - 10 of 17
MURRAY v. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY-INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2024cv04874
Plaintiff:
MARIA TUCKER MURRAY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY-INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6212 Injunctive Relief from IRS Lien
Manuel Lampon-Paz v. USA, et al
as 22-2861
Petitioner / Appellant:
MANUEL LAMPON-PAZ
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
LAMPON-PAZ v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
MANUEL LAMPON-PAZ
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
SHAIKH v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 3:2018cv17695
Plaintiff:
KIA H. SHAIKH and ZIA H. SHAIKH
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Smith v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2016mc00165
Petitioner:
Jerry V. Smith
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
In re: Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2016mc00079
Petitioner:
Jerry V. Smith
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Fraser v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2016cv00650
Plaintiff:
CLYDE FRASER
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gandrup v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015mc00287
Petitioner:
Jim Gandrup
Respondent:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and Julieta Johnson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Gandrup v. United State of America, Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2015mc00038
Petitioner:
Jim Gandrup
Respondent:
United State of America, Internal Revenue Service and Julieta Johnson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
ROBERTSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv07365
Petitioner:
JAMES V. ROBERTSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and DENNIS STIFFLER
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
