Cases 1 - 10 of 1,249
Fey v General Motors LLC
as 5:2024cv04595
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael John Fey
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
ERAMUS v. LEGALZOOM.COM, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv07831
Defendant:
BUSINESS LICENSES, LLC, LEGALZOOM, INC., JOHN DOES 1 TO 10 and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN ERAMUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Fraud
Cohen Legacy Plumbing and Construction LLC v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv02833
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FRED BEANS FORD, INC. doing business as FRED BEANS FORD OF DOYLESTOWN, Feasterville Auto Center, Inc. doing business as JOHN KENNEDY FORD OF FEASTERVILLE and others
Plaintiff:
Cohen Legacy Plumbing and Construction LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
RUNCIMAN v. 84 LUMBER COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv00852
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, JOHN DOES 1-30 and 84 LUMBER COMPANY
Plaintiff:
ANGEL RUNCIMAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
NEUMENTUM, INC. v. MCGURRIN
as 2:2024cv06395
Plaintiff:
NEUMENTUM, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN TAGGART MCGURRIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MADLINGER v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv06185
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-50, ABC CORP. 1-50 and MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Plaintiff:
SCOTT MADLINGER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
LY BERDITCHEV CORP. v. TELIC INTERNATIONAL, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
LY BERDITCHEV CORP.
Defendant:
TELIC INTERNATIONAL, LLC and ROCCO AZZARITO
Cross Defendant:
BUSINESS ENTITIES A-J and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
John Kodenkandeth v. UPMC Health Plan Inc, et al
as 24-1208
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. KODENKANDETH
Defendant:
UPMC HEALTH PLAN INC, DBA UPMC for Life, UPM CORPORATE HOLDING CO, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS SERVICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
