Cases 11 - 20 of 43
7-ELEVEN, INC. v. GUVENAL et al
as 2:2017cv01175
Plaintiff:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Defendant:
AYSAN GUVENAL and GUVENAL INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
7 Eleven Inc v. Karamjeet Sodhi, et al
as 17-1262
Plaintiff - Appellee:
7 ELEVEN INC
Defendant - Appellant:
KARAMJEET SODHI
Defendant - Appellee:
MANJINDER SINGH, KARAMJIT SINGH and DOES 1 THROUGH 50 INCLUSIVE
7 Eleven Inc v. Karamjeet Sodhi, et al
as 16-3163
Plaintiff - Appellee:
7 ELEVEN INC
Defendant - Appellant:
KARAMJEET SODHI
Defendant - Appellee:
MANJINDER SINGH, KARAMJIT SINGH and DOES 1 THROUGH 50 INCLUSIVE
ABOURAS et al v. 7-ELEVEN, INC.
as 2:2016cv01999
Plaintiff:
NABILA ABOURAS and STENTON INVESTMENT, INC.
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Counter_claimant:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Counter_defendant:
NABILA ABOURAS and STENTON INVESTMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BHALLA v. 7-ELEVEN, INC.
as 2:2015cv01715
Plaintiff:
VIKRAM BHALLA
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATEL v. 7-ELEVEN, INC.
as 2:2014cv06568
Plaintiff:
HARSHAL PATEL
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Counter_claimant:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Counter_defendant:
HARSHAL PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
PATEL et al v. 7-ELEVEN, INC. et al
as 3:2014cv04762
Plaintiff:
BIJEN PATEL and KALPANA PATEL
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
7-ELEVEN, INC. v. HADDAD
as 1:2014cv03566
Plaintiff:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Defendant:
AMID N. HADDAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sandhu et al v. 7-Eleven Inc.
as 1:2014cv00565
Plaintiff:
Sakattar Singh Sandhu , Paramjit Kaur Sandhu , Rosie Sandhu and others
Defendant:
7-Eleven Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
7-ELEVEN, INC. v. VICTOR et al
as 3:2014cv02124
Plaintiff:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Defendant:
THOMAS VICTOR , MARIAN MIKAILE , 559 STORE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
