Cases 31 - 40 of 110
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LEONARD COLLIER ELDERS COUNSELING GROUP, INC.
as 2:2019cv02330
Defendant:
LEONARD COLLIER ELDERS COUNSELING GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AMERICAN EXPRESS LOAN, INC.
as 2:2019cv02325
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPRESS LOAN, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CORNERSTONE MEDICAL TRANSPORT
as 2:2019cv02328
Defendant:
CORNERSTONE MEDICAL TRANSPORT
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BARLEY N HOPS, LLC
as 5:2019cv02327
Defendant:
BARLEY N HOPS, LLC
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BRIGICH et al
as 2:2019cv00528
Defendant:
MATTHEW PAUL BRIGICH, SR. and ALBERTA JANE BRIGICH
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CARL R. BIEBER, INC.
as 5:2019cv00734
Plaintiff:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CARL R. BIEBER and CARL R. BIEBER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF J.G. NASCON, INC. v. FIDELIS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv05586
Plaintiff:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF J.G. NASCON, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SURETY COMPANY and FIDELIS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01352
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03822
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00968
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
