Cases 1 - 10 of 66
LENTO et al v. ALTMAN et al
as 3:2024cv05150
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D. LENTO, ESQ. and LENTO LAW FIRM, LLC
Defendant:
KEITH ALTMAN, ESQ. and THE LAW OFFICE OF KEITH ALTMAN, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
LENTO et al v. ALTMAN et al
as 2:2024cv05150
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D. LENTO, ESQ. and LENTO LAW FIRM, LLC
Defendant:
KEITH ALTMAN, ESQ. and THE LAW OFFICE OF KEITH ALTMAN, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gregory Podlucky v. Lindsay Law Firm
as 24-1195
Plaintiff:
GREGORY J. PODLUCKY
Defendant:
LINDSAY LAW FIRM
SHIPP v. MARSH et al
as 2:2023cv01995
Plaintiff:
KATIE M. SHIPP
Defendant:
JAMES R. MARSH and MARSH LAW FIRM PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
PODLUCKY v. THE LINDSAY LAW FIRM, P.C.
as 2:2023cv01294
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOSEPH PODLUCKY
Defendant:
THE LINDSAY LAW FIRM, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gregory Podlucky v. Lindsay Law Firm
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY J. PODLUCKY
Defendant / Appellee:
LINDSAY LAW FIRM, P.C.
ONYX ENTERPRISES CANADA INC.
as 3:2023cv02913
Plaintiff:
ONYX ENTERPRISES CANADA INC.
Defendant:
STANISLAV ROYZENSHTEYN, ROMAN GERASHENKO, DANIEL GINZBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
PODLUCKY v. THE LINDSAY LAW FIRM, P.C.
as 2:2023cv00858
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOSEPH PODLUCKY
Defendant:
THE LINDSAY LAW FIRM, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
KHAN v. GRAY et al
as 2:2021cv13352
Plaintiff:
ADNAN KHAN
Defendant:
NAVARRO GRAY, THE GRAY LAW FIRM, LLC, DANIEL DESIR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schwartz Law Firm, LLC v. Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina
as 2:2020cv06055
Defendant:
Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina
Plaintiff:
Schwartz Law Firm, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
