Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Lesroy Browne v. National Collegiate Student Loan Trust, et al
as 24-1896
Plaintiff:
LESROY E. BROWNE, on behalf of himself and those similarly situated
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUST, also known as NATIONAL COLLEGIATE MASTER STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1, WILMINGTON TRUST CO, as Trustee for National Collegiate Student Loan Trust, US BANK NA, in its Role as Special Servicer for the National Collegiate Student Loan Trust and others
Lesroy Browne v. National Collegiate Student Loan Trust, et al
as 23-2017
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LESROY E. BROWNE, on behalf of himself and those similarlysituated
Defendant / Appellant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUST, also known as NATIONAL COLLEGIATE MASTERSTUDENT LOAN TRUST I, TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS INC, WILMINGTON TRUST CO, as Trustee for National Collegiate StudenLoan Trust and others
BROWNE v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUST et al
as 2:2022cv02713
Plaintiff:
LESROY E. BROWNE
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUST A/K/A NATIONAL COLLEGIATE MASTER STUDENT LOAN TRUST I, NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2003-1, NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2004-1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Declaratory Judgment
LIFETOUCH NATIONAL SCHOOL STUDIOS INC. v. ROLES
as 3:2015cv00234
Plaintiff:
LIFETOUCH NATIONAL SCHOOL STUDIOS INC.
Defendant:
ELIZABETH ROLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RZASA-ORMES et al v. ABOYOUN et al
as 2:2009cv04298
Plaintiff:
LEIGH E. RZASA-ORMES
Defendant:
JOSEPH S. ABOYOUN, JOHN DOE 1-10, XYZ COMPANY (fictitious names for persons and entities whose roles are unknown) and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
GIBLIN & GIBLIN, PAUL J. GIBLIN, JR. and BRIANT GIBLIN
ThirdParty Defendant:
NICHOLAS PALEOLOGOS, CHUCK LANYARD and ROBERT HASSETT
Debtor:
JEEP EAGLE 17, INC., et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
