Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Romeo v. Internetwork Expert, LLC
as 1:2020cv00610
Plaintiff:
Armando Romeo
Defendant:
Internetwork Expert, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ABELLA et al v. LM INSURANCE CORPORATION
as 2:2018cv02702
Plaintiff:
EMMELINE ABELLA and ROMEO ABELLA
Defendant:
LM INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILKINS et al v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2016cv05326
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WILKINS and SHANTEL ROMEO WILKINS
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. R&S L.M.C. LLC et al
as 2:2015cv04019
Plaintiff:
LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
R&S L.M.C. LLC , ROMEO CALLUENG and SUSAN CALLUENG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
DRAGHICI et al v. AMERICAN STRATEGIC INSURANCE CORP.
as 3:2013cv06097
Plaintiff:
ANDREA DRAGHICI and ROMEO DRAGHICI
Defendant:
AMERICAN STRATEGIC INSURANCE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
ROMEO-QUINLAN v. MONUMENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2009cv06002
Plaintiff:
CARMELA ROMEO-QUINLAN
Defendant:
MONUMENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
MONUMENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. ROMEO et al
as 2:2009cv05711
Plaintiff:
MONUMENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
RACHEL ROMEO and CARMELA ROMEO-QUINLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
MALMANGER v. MCKINNEY ROMEO MOTORS INC.
as 2:2009cv00183
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. MALMANGER
Defendant:
MCKINNEY ROMEO MOTORS INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jacqueline Romeo v. UNUM Provident Corp
as 08-1760
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACQUELINE ROMEO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNUM PROVIDENT CORP
M. COHEN & SONS v. ROMEO ENGINEERING, INC.
as 2:2007cv04193
Plaintiff:
M. COHEN & SONS
Defendant:
ROMEO ENGINEERING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
