Cases 21 - 30 of 68
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC, f/k/a AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC. v. LJ AUTOMOTIVE, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv06233
Plaintiff:
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC, f/k/a AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC.
Defendant:
MARIE DESTEFANO, LIVINGSTON T. JOHNSON and LJ AUTOMOTIVE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Johnson Controls Technology Company v. Distech Controls Inc.
as 1:2020cv00961
Plaintiff:
Johnson Controls Technology Company
Defendant:
Distech Controls Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1
Johnson v. Xootr, LLC
as 1:2020cv00820
Plaintiff:
Mark Johnson
Defendant:
Xootr, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Johnson Controls Technology Company v. BuildingIQ, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00521
Plaintiff:
Johnson Controls Technology Company
Defendant:
BuildingIQ, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
HINTON et al v. ROSEWOOD INN CATERERS, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01515
Plaintiff:
URSULA SANCHEZ, BROOKE JOHNSON, KATARINA VAN DERHAM and others
Defendant:
SANSOM STREET, INC., ROSEWOOD INN CATERERS, LLC and THOMAS SHERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
SOUZA et al v. CONTROVERSY, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00691
Plaintiff:
JAIME EDMONDSON-LONGORIA, BROOKE JOHNSON, ALANA MARIE SOUZA and others
Defendant:
CONTROVERSY, LLC and MARK LATORRE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Anuwave LLC v. Johnson Controls Security Solutions LLC
as 1:2018cv01702
Defendant:
Johnson Controls Security Solutions LLC
Plaintiff:
Anuwave LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
JOHNSON v. JACKSON
as 2:2018cv00971
Plaintiff:
ASIA JOHNSON
Defendant:
CURTIS JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
METROPCS v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2017cv04557
Plaintiff:
METROPCS
Defendant:
ISAIAH MICHAEL THOMAS, ZAMIR JEFFERSON, CHRISTOPHER ALEXANDER T. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
