Cases 1 - 10 of 146
KOSTROUN v. EXCEL PHYSICAL THERAPY, P.C.
as 2:2024cv07020
Defendant:
EXCEL PHYSICAL THERAPY, P.C.
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM KOSTROUN
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
WAREKA v. MULTALER INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2024cv06445
Defendant:
MULTALER INCORPORATED doing business as YON-KA PARIS USA and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
TAMARA WAREKA and TAMARA WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Kostroun v. The Daily Loud, LLC
as 2:2024cv01000
Plaintiff:
William Kostroun
Defendant:
The Daily Loud, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Russel Williams Home Services LLC v. Minleon International (USA) Limited LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00912
Defendant:
Minleon International (USA) Limited LLC and Minleon Group Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Russel Williams Home Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
COBB v. KEOUGHAN
as 2:2024cv01114
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COBB
Defendant:
THOMAS KEOUGHAN and THOMAS KEOUGHAN doing business as TOY JOBS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC v. GLEASON et al
as 2:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC
Defendant:
WILLIAM GLEASON and DANNICOLE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
MISTER SOFTEE FRANCHISE LLC et al v. GIANNOS et al
as 1:2024cv02280
Plaintiff:
MISTER SOFTEE FRANCHISE LLC and MISTER SOFTEE INC
Defendant:
WILLIAM GIANNOS and MISTER SOFTEE OF CONNECTICUT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
William Grondin v. Fanatics Inc
as 23-2242
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILLIAM GRONDIN
Defendant / Appellant:
FANATICS INC
William Grondin v. Fanatics Inc
as 23-2149
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM GRONDIN
Defendant / Appellee:
FANATICS INC
SHERMAN v. ROYAL PRO HEATING AND COOLING LLC
as 2:2023cv02075
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SHERMAN
Defendant:
ROYAL PRO HEATING AND COOLING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
