Cases 1 - 10 of 54
OOM INC. et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv02762
Plaintiff:
OOM INC., DHARM, INC., DIPAK R. PATEL and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6532 IRS: Refund of Tax Penalty
CRABB et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022mc00018
Plaintiff:
KENTON C CRABB and RPT, LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
UNITED STATES v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 1:2021cv16500
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
JUAN C. RODRIGUEZ and RODRIGUEZ INCOME TAXES, LLC
THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM C. MACK et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2020cv09010
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM C. MACK and LORRAINE A. WILKINSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SILAGY CONTRACTING, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00435
Defendant:
Robert C. Silagy and Silagy Contracting, LLC
Plaintiff:
United States of America
DIXON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv14101
Petitioner:
ALAN C DIXON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. BELL et al
as 2:2019cv02437
Defendant:
JENNIFER C. BELL and JAMES A. BELL
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MULLER and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604 a IRS: Complaint to Enforce IRS Summons
POTTGEN et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2018cv01607
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. POTTGEN and JUDY C. POTTGEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
United States of America v. Shiley
as 1:2018cv02150
Defendant:
Stephen C. Shiley
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. SERVIN
as 2:2018cv02155
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and KERRY C. MARTIN
Defendant:
JEFFREY D. SERVIN
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
