Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 171 - 180 of 86,830
Jose Membreno-Palacios, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1853
Petitioner: JOSE MATILDE MEMBRENO-PALACIOS and W. A. M.-A.
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, et al v. Secretary United States Department of Health and H, et al
as 24-1819
Plaintiff: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA AB
Defendant: SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ADMINISTRATOR CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES
USA v. Javier Osorio
as 24-1831
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JAVIER OSORIO
THE PHILADELPHIA REGIONAL PORT AUTHORITY v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 2:2024cv01008
Plaintiff: THE PHILADELPHIA REGIONAL PORT AUTHORITY
Defendant: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, DISTRICT COMMANDER FOR THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JEFFREY BEEMAN, CHIEF OF THE REGULATORY BRANCH FOR THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, TODD A. SCHAIBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Theall v. FCA US LLC
as 2:2024cv01892
Plaintiff: Howard I Theall, Jr
Defendant: FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00748
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Nazhir Regis
as 24-1836
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: NAZHIR REGIS
USA v. Christian Womack
as 24-1816
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CHRISTIAN DIOR WOMACK, also known as GUCCI PRADA
Maxo Jean v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1846
Petitioner: MAXO JEAN
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Roger Sedlak
as 24-1785
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ROGER SEDLAK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?