Cases 11 - 20 of 869
Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc, et al
as 24-1774
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Esq.
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC, DOW INC, CORTEVA INC and others
DORIN v. EXSCIENTIA P.L.C. et al
as 1:2024cv05692
Plaintiff:
ORINDO DORIN
Defendant:
EXSCIENTIA P.L.C., ANDREW HOPKINS, BEN R. TAYLOR and others
ATS TREE SERVICES, LLC v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al
as 2:2024cv01743
Plaintiff:
ATS TREE SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Lina M Khan, Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and others
Petitioner:
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Amicus Curiae:
National Retail Federation, National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center, Inc., INTERNATIONAL FRANCHISE ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv04869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv04866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
ANDREWS v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2024cv01646
Plaintiff:
SELENA ANDREWS
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SILVERBERG v. DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC., DOW, INC., CORTEVA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
