Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Carlisle v. Millendo Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00678
Defendant:
Carol G. Gallagher, John Howe III, Julia C. Owens and others
Plaintiff:
Sam Carlisle
Carlisle v. AeroJet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00281
Defendant:
James R. Henderson, Audrey A. McNiff, Eileen P. Drake and others
Plaintiff:
Sam Carlisle
Martin Rugamba v. CRST Inc, et al
as 20-2934
Defendant / Appellee:
CRST INC, LARRY YEO, CRST MANAGER OF CARLISLE YORK PENNSYLVANIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN RUGAMBA
LETTER REQUEST FROM LOCAL COURT OF BAUTZEN, GERMANY IN THE MATTER OF AURELIA PETRASCH V. JOHNNY EUGENE CARLISLE et al
as 2:2020mc00048
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re:
LETTER REQUEST FROM LOCAL COURT OF BAUTZEN, GERMANY IN THE MATTER OF AURELIA PETRASCH V. JOHNNY EUGENE CARLISLE
Battlestone Steel, LLC v. Carlisle Auto Industries, Inc.
as 1:2016mc00238
Petitioner:
Battlestone Steel, LLC
Respondent:
Carlisle Auto Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Spies v. Carlisle HMA, LLC
as 1:2014cv01443
Plaintiff:
Josie Spies
Defendant:
Carlisle HMA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Zazzali v. Alexander Partners LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00828
Plaintiff:
James R. Zazzali
Defendant:
Alexander Partners LLC, Alternative Wholesaling Group LLC, Arque Orion Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
USA/Postal Inspector v. A parcel bearing Express Mail number E1464180116US, addressed to Lisa Wood, 248 Franklin Street, Carlisle, PA 17013
as 1:2012mc00218
Plaintiff:
USA/Postal Inspector
Defendant:
A parcel bearing Express Mail number E1464180116US, addressed to Lisa Wood, 248 Franklin Street, Carlisle, PA 17013
CARLISLE v. MATSON LUMBER CO, et al
as 2:1995cv00376
Plaintiff:
ALBERT T. CARLISLE
Defendant:
MATSON LUMBER CO and MATSON HARDWOODS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
