Cases 11 - 20 of 1,143
Jung v. Peisert et al
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Changyoung Jung
Defendant:
Daniel A. Peisert, Paul Schwichtenberg, Heather L. Mason and others
TAYLOR v. SUNSEA ENERGY LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
MARIBETH TAYLOR
Defendant:
SUNSEA ENERGY LLC, SUNSEA ENERGY NJ, LLC, SUNSEA ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
K Street Capital Investments LLC AQ-1 v. Information Grid Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
K Street Capital Investments LLC AQ-1
Defendant:
Information Grid Ltd., William Cowell de Gruchy, Cleve Adams and others
Smith v. CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Daniel Smith
Defendant:
CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc., Robert J. Wills, Janet Dorling and others
Garcia v. Simo et al
as 1:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Jose Garcia derivatively on behalf of MAPLEBEAR INC. d/b/a Instacart
Defendant:
Fidji Simo, Nick Giovanni, Alan Ramsay and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
SILVERBERG v. DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC., DOW, INC., CORTEVA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1357
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1355
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1356
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
