Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Treasury Department of the Commonwealth et al v. Gregor et al
as 1:2016cv00351
Plaintiff:
Treasury Department of the Commonwealth and Timothy A. Reese
Defendant:
David Gregor and MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BAKER et al v. FIRST ADVANTAGE LNS SCREENING SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2015cv06317
Plaintiff:
BAKIRA BAKER , EARLE WAYNE BROWN , DAVID ALLARD and others
Defendant:
FIRST ADVANTAGE LNS SCREENING SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
REESE et al v. GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv02197
Plaintiff:
EARL REESE , WALTER CHRUBY , STEPHEN OROSZ, JR. and others
Defendant:
GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332 Telecommunications Act
In re: Robert Gene Rega
as 11-4008
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT GENE REGA
Defendant - Respondent:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LOUIS FOLINO, Superintendent/S.C.I. Greene, JEFFREY MARTIN, Captian and others
Nominal Respondent:
TERRENCE F. MCVERRY
In re: Alton Brown, et al
as 10-4544
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, WILLIAM STICKMAN, LOUIS S. FOLINO and others
USA v. Lamont Reese
as 10-4044
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LAMONT REESE, AKA MAN
BUSHANSKY v. SUPERIOR WELL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv01121
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BUSHANSKY
Defendant:
SUPERIOR WELL SERVICES, INC., DAVID E. WALLACE, ANTHONY J. MENDICINO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
