Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Perwaish v. Attorney General United State
as 17-3008
Petitioner:
PERWAISH, AKA Perwaish Lnu, AKA Perwaish Khan, AKA Perwaish Hadi Khan, AKA Fnu Perwaish
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SULLIVAN et al v. KHAN CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 2:2017mc00248
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH SULLIVAN , BRICKLAYERS JOINT APPRENTICE TRAINING FUND , LABOR MANAGEMENT FUND and others
Defendant:
KHAN CONSTRUCTION, INC., MEDHI KHAN, JOHN AND/OR JANE DOE FUDICIARY and others
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. HAMILTON HEALTHCARE P.C. et al
as 3:2017cv00674
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. , GEICO INDEMNITY CO. , GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
HAMILTON HEALTHCARE P.C., BARRY FASS, M.D., DAVID E. SMITH, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
KHAN et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00209
Plaintiff:
ZABIR KHAN , NOORJIHAN KHAN and INDUS UNITED INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 202
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
KHAN v. VAYN
as 2:2013cv01294
Plaintiff:
KAMRAN KHAN
Defendant:
LEO VAYN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
QASIM et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 2:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD QASIM , WAHEEDA MOHAMMED , HAMEEDA MOHAMMED and others
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS , JANET NAPOLITANO and HILARY CLINTON
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208
BOYKIN v. MERS/MERSCORP et al
as 2:2011cv04856
Defendant:
MERS/MERSCORP , COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP , HSBC BANK USA N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
VERA BOYKIN
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1971
Mohammed Khan, et al v. Atty Gen USA
as 11-1789
Petitioner:
MOHAMMED SHUAIB KHAN and FARAS SHUAIB KHAN
Respondent:
ATTY GEN USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
