Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Anthony Floyd v. USA, et al
as 19-2627
Defendant / Appellee: BANK OF AMERICA, Third Party Respondent, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT DE LOS SANTOS, Special Agent and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTHONY JAMES FLOYD
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. CORTES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv05524
Plaintiff: REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA , MONICA MORRILL , RALPH E. WIKE, III and others
Defendant: PEDRO A. CORTES
Movant: CEIBA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Phoenix, City of v. General Chemical Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv04257
Plaintiff: Phoenix, City of
Defendant: GENERAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, GENERAL CHEMICAL PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS LLC, Chemtrade Logistics Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
AIRCONDITIONING AND REFRIGERATION INDUSTRY HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND et al v. VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv03087
Plaintiff: AIRCONDITIONING AND REFRIGERATION INDUSTRY HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND, FIRE AND POLICE HEALTH CARE FUND, SAN ANTONIO, NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL & HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND and others
Defendant: VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC, VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC., PHILIDOR RX SERVICES and others
In Re: VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC, THIRD-PARTY PAYOR LITIGATION
Special Master: HON. DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH, RET.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Mesa, City of v. General Chemical Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv01712
Plaintiff: Mesa, City of
Defendant: GENERAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, GENERAL CHEMICAL PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS LLC, Chemtrade Logistics Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Scottsdale, City of v. General Chemical Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv01579
Plaintiff: Scottsdale, City of
Defendant: GENERAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, GENERAL CHEMICAL PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS LLC, Chemtrade Logistics Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
In re: Natural Born Citizen Party We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-3759
Not Party - Petitioner: In re: NATURAL BORN CITIZEN PARTY NATIONAL COMMITTEE and HAROLD W. VAN ALLEN
Defendant - Respondent: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, BARACK OBAMA, President Elect of the United States of America, President of the United States of America if Sworn In, and Individually, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff - Respondent: CHARLES F. KERCHNER, JR., LOWELL T. PATTERSON, DARRELL JAMES LENORMAND and others
Nominal Respondent: JEROME B. SIMANDLE
LOWER PASSAIC RIVER STUDY AREA COOPERATING PARTIES GROUP v. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
as 2:2015cv07828
Plaintiff: LOWER PASSAIC RIVER STUDY AREA COOPERATING PARTIES GROUP
Defendant: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
In re: Natural Born Citizen Party Nat, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-3463
Petitioner: In re: NATURAL BORN CITIZEN PARTY NATIONAL COMMITTEE and HAROLD W. VAN ALLEN
Plaintiff - Respondent: CHARLES F. KERCHNER, JR., LOWELL T. PATTERSON, DARRELL JAMES LENORMAND and others
Defendant - Respondent: BARACK OBAMA, President Elect of the United States of America, President of the United States of America if Sworn In, and Individually, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES CONGRESS and others
Respondent: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Nominal Respondent: JEROME B. SIMANDLE
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc, et al v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2236
Plaintiff - Appellant: MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC
Plaintiff - Appellee: ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OP, MEIJER INC, MEIJER DISTRIBUTION INC and others
Defendant - Appellee: WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, WARNER CHILCOTT US LLC and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?