Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 6,781
MARTIS v. MICHERY et al
as 2:2024cv02908
Plaintiff: MARIUS MARTIS
Defendant: DAVID MICHERY, MARY WINTER, MARK BETOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Red Dragon Partners, LLC v. TruthMD, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00450
Plaintiff: Red Dragon Partners, LLC
Defendant: TruthMD, LLC, Gemma Cunningham, Dr. Charles D. Rosen and others
KADER v. ITZKOWITZ et al
as 2:2024cv04718
Plaintiff: YISROEL KADER
Defendant: AHARON ITZKOWITZ, ARIS RENT A CAR and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1278
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
JAMAL et al v. ALLY FINANCIAL et al
as 2:2024cv00894
Defendant: ALLY FINANCIAL, ALLY, TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, USA, INC. and others
Plaintiff: AHMED JAMAL and REEM SUQI
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Murphy v. Slootman et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff: Patrick M. Murphy, Jr.
Defendant: Frank Slootman, Michael P. Scarpelli, Benoit Dageville and others
Scarborough v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00420
Plaintiff: Davant Scarborough
Defendant: AT&T Inc., John Stankey and Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff: FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant: CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
C.C. v. UNITES STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 3:2024cv04391
Plaintiff: C.C.
Defendant: UNITES STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, NEWARK ASYLUM OFFICE, USCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Clark v. Haynes International, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00402
Plaintiff: John Clark
Defendant: Haynes International, Inc., Robert H. Getz, Michael L. Shor and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?