Cases 31 - 40 of 1,009
LU v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2023cv01239
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
JANE E. YOUNG, JOE H. TUCKER, JR, LESLIE MILLER GREENSPAN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jackson v. Fonbuena Law Firm, PLLC
as 4:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
Gerard Jackson
Defendant:
Fonbuena Law Firm, PLLC doing business as Accident Attorneys of America
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jose Torres v. Sher Tremonte LLP, et al
as 23-1431
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE TORRES
Defendant / Appellee:
SHER TREMONTE LLP, JUSTIN M. SHER, MICHAEL TREMONTE and others
Defendant:
TOR B. EKELAND and JESSICA COONROD
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In re: Palani Karupaiyan, et al
as 23-1304
Petitioner:
In re: PALANI KARUPAIYAN, P. P. and R. P.
Respondent:
INFOSYS BPM, INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES LTD, CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
