Cases 31 - 40 of 2,816
Clark v. PGT Innovations, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
John Clark
Defendant:
PGT Innovations, Inc., Rodney Hershberger, Sheree Bargabos and others
SILVERBERG v. DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC., DOW, INC., CORTEVA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
THEODORE v. PURECYCLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2024mc00011
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. THEODORE
Defendant:
PURECYCLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MICHAEL OTWORTH, MICHAEL E. DEE and others
Respondent:
HINDENBURG RESEARCH, LLC
Anthony WilliamsIn re: Anthony Williams
as 24-1359
Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Darrell Williams v. Promedica Health Systems Inc
as 24-1369
Plaintiff:
DARRELL E. WILLIAMS, Personal Representative of the Estate of MONEENA WILLIAMS, Deceased
Defendant:
PROMEDICA HEALTH SYSTEMS INC, trading and doing business as PROMEDICA SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION (GREENTREE) trading and doing business as MANORCARE HEALTH SERVICES- GREENTREE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
In re: Ahmad Williams
as 24-1323
Petitioner:
In re: AHMAD WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE
Ballard v. Science 37 Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
William Ballard
Defendant:
Science 37 Holdings, Inc., David Coman, Robert Faulkner and others
Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Vernon Williams, et al
as 24-1238
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
Defendant:
VERNON WILLIAMS and JUDITH WILLIAMS
WILLIAMS v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
as 3:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH WILLIAMS
Defendant:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
