Cases 31 - 40 of 40
GREATER METROPOLITAN HOTEL EMPLOYERS-EMPLOYEES HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, LOCAL 17 HOSPITALITY BENEFIT FUND AND ROOFERS LOCAL 96 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2013cv04165
Plaintiff:
GREATER METROPOLITAN HOTEL EMPLOYERS-EMPLOYEES HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, LOCAL 17 HOSPITALITY BENEFIT FUND AND ROOFERS LOCAL 96 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES , ABBOTT RESPIRATORY LLC, ABBIVE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE MIAMI LODGE 20, INSURANCE TRUST FUND v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2013cv03951
Plaintiff:
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE MIAMI LODGE 20, INSURANCE TRUST FUND
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES , ABBOTT RESPIRATORY LLC , ABBVIE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2013cv01977
Plaintiff:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES , ABBOTT RESPIRATORY LLC , ABBVIE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC. v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2013cv01820
Plaintiff:
ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES , ABBOTT RESPIRATORY LLC, ABBVIE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WOMEN IN SUPPORT OF THE MILLION MAN MARCH et al
as 2:2012cv00457
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WOMEN IN SUPPORT OF THE MILLION MAN MARCH, FREDERICA BEY , DELACY DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Drake v. Filko
as 12-1150
Undetermined:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN LAW ENFORCEMENT EXECUTIVES, MAJOR CITIES CHEIFS ASSOCIATION, CEASEFIRE NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FINLEY FENTON, GREGORY C. GALLAHER, JOHN M. DRAKE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD A. JEREJIAN, in his Official Capacity as Judge of the Superior Court of Bergen County, ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY, SUPERINTENDENT NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE and others
Defendant:
PHILIP MAENZA, in his Official Capacity as Judge of the Superior Court of Morris County, ROBERT JONES, in his official capacity as Chief of the Hammonton, New Jersey Police Department and RICHARD COOK
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY M. MULLER
HIGHMARK INC. et al v. UPMC et al
as 2:2011cv00919
Plaintiff:
HIGHMARK INC. and KEYSTONE HEALTH PLAN WEST, INC.
Defendant:
UPMC , UPMC PRESBYTERIAN SHADYSIDE , MAGEE-WOMENS HOSPITAL OF UPMC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Beatriz Rhoades v. Young Womens Christian Assn of, et al
as 11-8011
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
BEATRIZ RHOADES
Defendant - Respondent:
YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF GREATER PITTSBURGH, VALERIE WHEATLEY, as an individual, BARBARA MANNING, as an individual and others
Cncl Tree Comm Inc v. USA
as 08-2036
Petitioner - Appellant:
CNCL TREE COMM INC, BETHEL NATIVE CORP and MINORITY MEDIA AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL
Respondent - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION
Intervenor-Defendant - Intervenor Respondent:
CTIA WIRELESS ASSN and T MOBILE USA INC
Not Party - Intervenor Respondent:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, Verizon Wireless
Not Party - Proposed Amicus Respondent:
ATLANITC WIRELESS LP, BARAT WIRELESS LP, KING STREET WIRELESS LP and others
Not Party - Proposed Intervenor Respondent:
LEAP WIRELESS INTL INC
Not Party - Amicus-petitioner:
ANTARES HOLDING LLC, ASIAN AMER JUSTICE CTR, BENTON FNDTN and others
Prometheus Radio v. FCC
as 03-3388
Not Party - Petitioner:
PROMETHEUS RADIO PROJECT
Not Party - Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Intervenor:
FOX ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC, FOX TELEVISION STATIONS INC, NBC INC and others
Not Party - Proposed Amicus-Appellee:
MICHAEL M. EPSTEIN
Not Party - Proposed Amicu:
NEIL ELLIS, MONTEREY LICENSES and MID WEST MANAGEMENT INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
