Cases 41 - 50 of 376
Wheeler v. Metromile, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wheeler
Defendant:
Metromile, Inc., Dan Preston, Colin Bryant and others
PRADOS v. METROMILE, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
HERNAN PRADOS
Defendant:
METROMILE, INC., DAN PRESTON, COLIN BRYANT and others
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. CLARK
as 2:2021cv05139
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
RICKY CLARK INDIVIDUALLY, AND doing business as VINTAGE CIGAR ROOM
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Bacchi v. Metromile, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Frank Bacchi
Defendant:
Metromile, Inc., Dan Preston, Colin Bryant and others
BLAKE v. METROMILE, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
MARK BLAKE
Defendant:
METROMILE, INC., DAN PRESTON, COLIN BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Melvin Clark v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 21-3262
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN R. CLARK
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY WASHINGTON COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Jonathan Pena v. Kevin Clark, et al
as 21-2931
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN PENA
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN CLARK, T. WATERS and A. FRITZINGER
Charles Clark, III, et al v. Governor of New Jersey, et al
as 21-2732
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES CLARK, III, SOLID ROCK BAPTIST CHURCH, New Jersey not-for-profit corporation, BIBLE BAPTIST CHURCH OF CLEMENTON, New Jersey not-for-corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF NEW JERSEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY, PATRICK J. CALLAHAN, Superintendent of State Police and State Director of Emergency Management in his official capacities and others
Kent Clark v. USA
as 21-2704
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENT LEROY CLARK
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Asia Johnson v. Orlando Harper, et al
as 21-2908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASIA JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ORLANDO HARPER, Warden, OFFICER BENJAMIN, Zone 2 Police Officer, DR. MARTONE, Doctor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
