Cases 41 - 50 of 412
Glover-Mott v. Herd et al
as 1:2022cv01070
Plaintiff:
MARILEE C. GLOVER-MOTT
Defendant:
Whitney Wolfe Herd, Anuradha B. Subramanian, Ann Mather and others
Nominal Defendant:
Bumble Inc.
Kocher v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2022cv01031
Plaintiff:
Donald Kocher
Defendant:
Brian Armstrong, Alesia J. Haas, Jennifer N. Jones and others
Nominal Defendant:
Coinbase, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Waterman v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00975
Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., Willard H. Dere, Catherine Friedman and others
Whitfield v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00973
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitefield and Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., Willard H. Dere, Catherine Friedman and others
Jones v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00967
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., Willard H. Dere, Catherine Friedman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jennifer Zuch v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 22-2244
Petitioner / Appellant:
JENNIFER ZUCH
Respondent / Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
JOHNSON v. THE TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv02698
Plaintiff:
RYAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
THE TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, KEVIN DALE, JESSE DECRESCENZO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CONNELLY et al v. GREEN et al
as 5:2022cv01163
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BERKS, JAMES GREEN, MATTHEW TRUSCOTT and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS P. CONNELLY, JR. and EMMA LYNNE DEAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPOINTMENT OF JENNIFER A. WILLIAMS AS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
as 2:2022mc00017
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPOINTMENT OF JENNIFER A. WILLIAMS AS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
