Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Smith v. Knights of Columbus et al
as 1:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
Gerald I. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Knights of Columbus, Barack Hussein Obama, Joseph Robinette Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
In re: Wade Knight
as 14-4837
Petitioner:
In re: WADE KNIGHT
Respondent:
CASE MANAGER JONATHAN KAMINSKI, WARDEN TROY WILLIAMSON, GEORGE C. NYE, III and others
Nominal Respondent:
RICHARD P. CONABOY
In Re: Photochromic Lens Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014mc00189
Defendant:
Transitions Optical Inc., Essilor International SA, Essilor of America, Inc. and others
Movant:
Holland & Knight
Plaintiff:
Keith Forbes and Brian Keith Roller
Intervenor:
Vision Service Plan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
USA v. Anthony Knight
as 14-3336
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY KNIGHT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KNIGHT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 2:2014cv01520
Plaintiff:
NICHE KNIGHT
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
USA v. Carl Knight
as 14-1195
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARL ANTHONY KNIGHT
In re: Wade Knight
as 13-4575
Petitioner:
In re: WADE KNIGHT
Respondent:
WARDEN TROY WILLIAMSON, CASE MANAGER JONATHAN KAMINSKI, GEORGE C. NYE, III and others
Nominal Respondent:
RICHARD P. CONABOY
TALMADGE et al v. BABCOCK & WILCOX POWER GENERATION GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01527
Plaintiff:
ALYNDA TALMADGE , JAMES DOUGLAS TALMADGE , ELIZABETH ANN LUCAS and others
Defendant:
BABCOCK & WILCOX POWER GENERATION GROUP, INC. , B&W TECHNICAL SERVICE, INC., ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Carl Knight
as 13-3910
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARL ANTHONY KNIGHT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
