Cases 41 - 50 of 93
Nelson Ocasio v. Michael Ciach, et al
as 19-1180
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTINE PETERSON and MAYOR MICHAEL CIACH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NELSON OCASIO
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF UPLAND
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00115
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00114
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Cary Peterson
as 19-1093
Defendant / Appellant:
CARY LEE PETERSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DIXON MILLS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC v. RGD HOLDING COMPANY, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv11927
Defendant:
GREG BERGER, RMPC DIXON, LLC, PROSPECT CAPITAL GROUP, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DIXON MILLS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Franchi v. Oclaro, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00817
Plaintiff:
Adam Franchi
Defendant:
Oclaro, Inc., Marissa Peterson, Edward Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
NORTHEAST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS FUNDS and the TRUSTEES THEREOF v. PETERSON STAEGER, INC.
as 3:2017cv07618
Petitioner:
NORTHEAST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS FUNDS and the TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
PETERSON STAEGER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Pierre Normil v. Attorney General United State
as 17-2830
Petitioner:
PETERSON PIERRE MORVILLEZ, AKA Pierre L. Normil, AKA Wilner Garcon, AKA Pierre Norvil, AKA Peterson Norvil
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Billy Balisage v. Attorney General United State
as 17-2405
Petitioner:
BILLY BALISAGE, AKA Billie Geam, AKA Jackson Peterson
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Peterson Morvillez v. Attorney General United States
as 17-2249
Petitioner:
PETERSON PIERRE MORVILLEZ, AKA Pierre Norvil, AKA Norvil Peterson, AKA Peterson Morvill, AKA Peterson Norvil, AKA Peter Morville, AKA Peterson Morville
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
