Cases 41 - 50 of 235
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION et al v. TMTE, INC. et al
as 2:2020mc00101
Defendant:
TMTE, INC., LUCAS THOMAS ERB, CHASE METALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF FLORIDA, SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & REGULATION, MISSISSIPPI SECRETARY OF STATE and others
USA v. David Washington
as 20-2970
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID WASHINGTON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jerome Washington v. Robert Gilmore, et al
as 20-2787
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT GILMORE, Overall Prison Official in SCI Greene and C.O. 1 COMER
John Kowal v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 20-2769
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY WASHINGTON COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN KOWAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv09332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Connecticut et al v. Sandoz, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03539
Plaintiff:
State of New Mexico, State of Missouri, Commonwealth (of) Pennsylvania and others
Defendant:
MALLINCKRODT PLC, ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, JOHN WESOLOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
USA v. Ryan Washington
as 20-2333
Defendant / Appellant:
RYAN J. WASHINGTON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Osborne v. Adamczyk et al
as 1:2020cv00807
Defendant:
Gregory P. Lewis, Jaime Chico Pardo, Thomas A. Szlosek and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Osborne
Nominal Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv07059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Keith Rosario v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 20-1986
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY WASHINGTON COUNTY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH ROSARIO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
