Cases 61 - 70 of 77
Mikhail Bulatov v. Atty Gen USA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 11-4357
Petitioner:
MIKHAIL BULATOV
Respondent:
ATTY GEN USA
:
SECRETARY US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DIRECTOR US ICE, as Assistant Secretary for Immigration and Customs Enforcement., GARY MEAD, as Executive Associate Director, Enforcement and Removal Operations and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA/ICE v. 627 Ross St, Harrisburg, PA
as 1:2011mc00294
Plaintiff:
USA/ICE
Defendant:
627 Ross St, Harrisburg, PA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2011cv05396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Edwin Tanta Munoz v. Atty Gen USA, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 10-3997
Petitioner:
EDWIN WILLIAM TANTA MUNOZ
Respondent:
ATTY GEN USA and DHS/ICE
MARCAKIS v. INTERSTATE CHECK SYSTEMS, INC. (ICS)
as 2:2010cv05065
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH MARCAKIS
Defendant:
INTERSTATE CHECK SYSTEMS, INC. (ICS)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1679
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.