Cases 61 - 70 of 634
PARIS v. LAMIA et al
as 2:2022cv01146
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. PARIS doing business as MORRIS, PARIS & ASSOCIATES
Defendant:
ANTHONY LAMIA, JR., KRISTIN ROBBINS, SARAH JONES and others
Kocher v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2022cv01031
Plaintiff:
Donald Kocher
Defendant:
Brian Armstrong, Alesia J. Haas, Jennifer N. Jones and others
Nominal Defendant:
Coinbase, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Jones v. Radius Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00967
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
Radius Health, Inc., Willard H. Dere, Catherine Friedman and others
Charles TalbertIn re: Charles Talbert
as 22-2293
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES TALBERT
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN, Deputy Secretary for Administration of the DOC, TABB BICKELL, Executive Deputy Secretary for the Institutional Operations of DOC and others
USA v. Richard Potts
as 22-2200
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD POTTS, a/k/a NASIR HAQQ, a/k/a NASIR JONES, a/k/a NASIR, a/k/a NAZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Kareem Smith
as 22-2178
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KAREEM SMITH, a/k/a Wink, a/k/a Lucky, a/k/a Lamar Jones, a/k/a Ronald Parker
USA v. Anthony Jones
as 22-2064
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY JONES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
