Cases 61 - 70 of 364
CITY OF HOBOKEN v. EXXON MOBIL CORP. et al
as 2:2020cv14243
Defendant:
PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY, PHILLIPS 66, EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF HOBOKEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wolf v. Montage Resources Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv01324
Defendant:
Southwestern Energy Company, D. Martin Phillips, Richard Paterson and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Wolf
Scott Phillips v. Archdiocese of Newark, et al
as 20-2948
Defendant / Appellee:
ARCHDIOCESE NEWARK, ROBERT GRIMALDI, MATT POPOLA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT PHILLIPS, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem on behalf of S.P., B.P., and K.P.
HINES v. GOWEN et al
as 2:2020cv04673
Defendant:
LEON O. MOULDER, JR., ROBERTO CUCA, MAXINE GOWEN and others
Nominal Defendant:
TREVENA, INC.
Plaintiff:
BRAD HINES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04587
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Golub v. Lance et al
as 1:2020cv01251
Defendant:
Eric J. Zahler, Robert L. Phillips, Brian G. Kenning and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Golub
Nominal Defendant:
Maxar Technologies Inc.
Smith v. Pfenex Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01192
Defendant:
Lorianne Masuoka, Phillip M. Schneider, Eef Schimmelpennink and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Smith
Purdy v. Phillips & Cohen Associates, Ltd.
as 1:2020cv01077
Plaintiff:
Sandra Purdy
Defendant:
Phillips & Cohen Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv10099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Michael Weinik v. Temple University of the Commo, et al
as 20-2525
Defendant / Appellee:
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF HIGHER EDUCATION, TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, PHILLIP ACEVEDO and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL WEINIK, D.O.
Defendant / Appellant:
SHIVANI DUA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
