Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 103
In re: John Lamont Lane
as 13-2989
Petitioner: In re: JOHN L. LANE
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
v. LANE
as 8:2012mc00267
CARE ONE MANAGEMENT, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv06371
Plaintiff: CARE ONE MANAGEMENT, LLC , CARE ONE AT BIRCHWOOD, LLC , CARE ONE AT EAST BRUNSWICK, LLC and others
Defendant: UNITED HEALTHCARE WORKERS EAST, SEIU 1199 and NEW ENGLAND HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES UNION, DISTRICT 1199
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Christ the King Manor Inc, et al v. Secretary United States Depart, et al
as 12-3746
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHRIST THE KING MANOR INC, BALDOCK ASSOCIATES, d/b/a Presque Isle Rhabilitation & Nursing Center, BONHAM NURSING CENTER, d/b/a Presque Isle Rhabilitation & Nursing Center and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: PERINI SERVICE SOUTHHAMPTON MANOR, d/b/a Shippingsburg Health Care Center
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CHARLENE FRIZZERA, in her official capacity as Acting Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and HARRIET DICHTER, in her officail capacity as Secretary of Public welfare for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare
Christ the King Manor Inc v. Secretary United States Depart
as 12-3501
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHRIST THE KING MANOR INC, BONHAM NURSING CENTER, BRIARLEAF NURSING AND CONVALESCENT CENTER INC and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: BALDOCK ASSOCIATES, d/b/a Baldock Health Care Center and HUMBERT LANE ASSSOCIATES, d/b/a Humbert Lane Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CHARLENE FRIZZERA, in her official capacity as Acting Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and HARRIET DICHTER, in her officail capacity as Secretary of Public welfare for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare
Christ the King Manor Inc v. Secretary US Department of Hea We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-3401
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHRIST THE KING MANOR INC
Plaintiff - Numerous Parties See Appellant: BALDOCK ASSOCIATES, d/b/a Baldock Health Care Center, BONHAM NURSING CENTER, BRIARLEAF NURSING AND CONVALESCENT CENTER CENTER INC and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: HUMBERT LANE ASSSOCIATES, d/b/a Humbert Lane Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, JEWISH HOME OF GREATER HARRISBURG, MISERICORDIA CONVALESCENT HOME and others
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellant: WINDSOR INC, d/b/a Snyder Memorial Health Care Center
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CHARLENE FRIZZERA, in her official capacity as Acting Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and HARRIET DICHTER, in her officail capacity as Secretary of Public welfare for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare
I.U.P.A.T. DISTRICT COUNCIL #57 COMBINED FUNDS v. BULLDOG PAINTING PITTSBURGH, LLC.
as 2:2012mc00241
Plaintiff: I.U.P.A.T. DISTRICT COUNCIL #57 COMBINED FUNDS
Defendant: BULLDOG PAINTING PITTSBURGH, LLC
Garnishee: INTERPARK, LLC, THE LANE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION and NATHAN CONTRACTING
In re: Aaron Jones, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2119
Petitioner: In re: AARON MICHAEL JONES, a/k/a Michael John Aaron Jones
Respondent: BRADLEY MERMON, Officer Robinson Township Police, DALE VIETMEIER, Robinson Township Police, ANDREW BRUGGMAN, Trooper Pennsylvania State Police and others
Nominal Respondent: MAUREEN P. KELLY
In Re: Rhonshawn Jackson, et al
as 12-1657
Petitioner: RHONSHAWN JACKSON
Respondent: JEFFREY BEARD, SHIRLEY SMEAL, LAWLER and others
CARPENTERS COMBINED FUNDS INC. v. LANE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC.
as 2:2012mc00060
Plaintiff: CARPENTERS COMBINED FUNDS INC.
Defendant: LANE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?