Cases 71 - 78 of 78
A.B. et al v. STAROPOLI et al
as 2:2010cv02487
Plaintiff:
A.B. and L.B.
Defendant:
MARK STAROPOLI, PAULA STAROPOLI, CLARKSTOWN SOCCER CLUB and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
-JS In Re: BAYSIDE LITIGATION, et al v. , et al
as 1:1997cv05127
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
TONY BACON , ANDREW GORDON , MICHAEL S. SHONTZ and others
Consol_defendant:
CLEMENT , MYERS , JOHN CONESKY and others
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
NEW JERSEY PHYSICIANS, INC. et al v. OBAMA, et al
as 2:2010cv01489
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY PHYSICIANS, INC. , MARIO A. CRISCITO, M.D. and ROE PATIENT
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA, TIMOTHY GEITHNER and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ROE et al v. PENTAGROUP FINANCIAL, LLC
as 2:2009cv00654
Plaintiff:
LISA ROE and JACK ROE
Defendant:
PENTAGROUP FINANCIAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. ARGUETA et al
as 2:2008cv03203
Plaintiff:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
NORLIN ARGUETA, ASTRID ARIAS, NORLIN A. ARIAS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. William Roe
as 08-1542
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM EDWARD ROE, a/k/a Edward Roe
GONZALEZ v. CHOUDHARY et al
as 1:2008cv00076
Plaintiff:
GRISSELLE GONZALEZ
Defendant:
ILMIA BANO CHOUDHARY, M.D., SOUTH JERSEY HEALTHCARE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, PHYSICIANS JOHN DOE I-V and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. BOYD et al
as 2:2007cv04097
Plaintiff:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RENNETTA BOYD, ANDRANETTE BOYD, KESHA BOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
