Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 323
USA v. Dijuan Taylor
as 24-1993
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DIJUAN TAYLOR
Derrick, et al v. Glen Mills Schools, et al
as 24-8018
Petitioner: DERRICK, Through and With His Next Friend and Mother Tina, WALTER, Through and With His Next Friend and Mother Janeva and THOMAS, Through His Next Friend and Mother Michelle, On Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated
Respondent: GLEN MILLS SCHOOLS, TERESA D. MILLER, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Human Services in Her Individual Capacity, THEODORE DALLAS, Former Secretary of The Department of Human Services in His Individual Capacity and others
DORIN v. EXSCIENTIA P.L.C. et al
as 1:2024cv05692
Plaintiff: ORINDO DORIN
Defendant: EXSCIENTIA P.L.C., ANDREW HOPKINS, BEN R. TAYLOR and others
USA v. Mister Tyrell Taylor
as 24-1776
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MISTER TYRELL TAYLOR
USA v. Armand Taylor
as 24-1706
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ARMAND TAYLOR
Taylor, Jr. v. The Chemours Company et al
as 1:2024cv00361
Plaintiff: Robert H. Taylor, Jr.
Defendant: The Chemours Company, Mark Newman, Jonathan Lock and others
TAYLOR v. SUNSEA ENERGY LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff: MARIBETH TAYLOR
Defendant: SUNSEA ENERGY LLC, SUNSEA ENERGY NJ, LLC, SUNSEA ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff: FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant: CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Taylor v. Axonics, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00298
Plaintiff: Steve Taylor
Defendant: Axonics, Inc., Michael H. Carrel, Raymond W. Cohen and others
Taylor v. Alteryx, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00203
Plaintiff: Steve Taylor
Defendant: Alteryx, Inc., Dean Stoecker, Charles Cory and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?