Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 125
ZELMA v. HALPERIN et al
as 2:2024cv01059
Plaintiff: RICHARD M. ZELMA
Defendant: MICHAEL PETER HALPERIN, HFA HOLDINGS LLP, IP HORIZON INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
DEPALMA v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., et al
as 2:2023cv22318
Plaintiff: DENNIS DEPALMA
Defendant: VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.,, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-5 (FICTIOUS NAMES DESCRIBING PRESENTLY UNIDENTIFIED BUSINESS ENTITIES) and JOHN DOES 1-10 (FICTITIOUS NAMES, TRUE NAMES PRESENTLY UNKNOWN)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
GREENSTAR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC et al v. DOES et al
as 3:2023cv21293
Plaintiff: GREENSTAR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and BLUE SURGE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
Defendant: JOHN DOES and ABC CORPORATION
JOHNSON v. SAFE MOVING, LLC
as 2:2022cv03706
Plaintiff: MORGAN JOHNSON
Defendant: SAFE MOVING, LLC, JOHN DOES AND JANE DOES (1-20), ABC CORPORATIONS (1-20) and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
D'ANDREA et al v. GELOK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00491
Plaintiff: CARMINE D'ANDREA and JENNIFER D'ANDREA
Defendant: RONALD ALBERT GELOK, JR., RONALD GELOK AND ASSOCIATES LLC, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv04840
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
PERDIGAO v. CONTOUR MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv19417
Plaintiff: Nilson Perdigao
Defendant: Contour Mortgage Corporation, Shane Weicberger, Charlene Fassle and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Michael Sakolsky v. Genie Industries, et al
as 21-2755
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL SAKOLSKY
Defendant / Appellee: GENIE INDUSTRIES, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-5, (representing presently unknown manufacturers, designers, distributors, assemblers, testers, and/or sellers of the subject lift in question) and XYZ CORPORATIONS 6-10, (unknown entities who removed any warnings and/or safety devices)
Defendant: XYZ CORPORATIONS 6-10, (representing presently unknown manufacturers, designers, distributors, assemblers, testers, and/or sellers of the subject lift in question)
MAGSIG v. START MOVING INC. et al
as 2:2021cv12135
Defendant: START MOVING INC. D/B/A KEIRA MOVING, JOHN DOES 1-10, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10, THE SAME BEING FICTITIOUS PARTIES and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL MAGSIG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
EMERSON et al v. ANDOVER SUBACUTE REHABILITATION CENTER I et al
as 2:2020cv20066
Defendant: ALLIANCE HEALTHCARE, ANDOVER SUBACUTE REHABILITATION CENTER I, JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100 and others
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF MICHELE DESBIENS BY PAUL DESBIENS, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM, MICHAEL EMERSON and ESTATE OF ALBERT C. ROBERTS BY BRIAN ROBERTS, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?