Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Carmencita Pedro v. EEOC, et al
as 21-2903
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARMENCITA MARIA PEDRO
Defendant:
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS, PHILADELPHIA WORKS INC and others
Carmencita Pedro v. UNITED STATES EEOC, et al
as 21-2317
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARMENCITA MARIA PEDRO
Defendant:
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS, PHILADELPHIA WORKS INC and others
ALARIS HEALTH AT WEST ORANGE v. DISTRICT 1199J, NUHHCE, AFSCME, AFL-CIO
as 2:2015cv02070
Petitioner:
ALARIS HEALTH AT WEST ORANGE
Respondent:
DISTRICT 1199J, NUHHCE, AFSCME, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
AFSCME DISTRICT COUNCIL 47 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00151
Plaintiff:
AFSCME DISTRICT COUNCIL 47 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. , TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED, BARR PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC. v. UTILITY WORKERS LOCAL 423 et al
as 2:2011cv01462
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
UTILITY WORKERS LOCAL 423, UTILITY WORKERS LOCAL 121 , UTILITY WORKERS LOCAL 537 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
MITCHELL, et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al
as 2:1999cv06306
Plaintiff:
SHARON R. MITCHELL , AUGUSTINE LOPRIORE , THOMAS M. BOWMAN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , EDWARD G. RENDELL , JOSEPH C. CERTAINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ASEA/AFSCME Local 52 Health Benefits Trust et al v. Merck & Co. Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02336
Plaintiff:
ASEA/AFSCME LOCAL 52 HEALTH BENEFITS TRUST and Claudia Edwards
Defendant:
Merck & Co. Inc., SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION and MERCK/SCHERING-PLOUGH PHARMACEUTICALS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
