Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 130
Galea v. Luciano et al
as 1:2024cv00534
Plaintiff: Joseph Galea
Defendant: Juan R. Luciano, Michael S. Burke, Theodore Colbert, III and others
MCGILLVARY v. SCUTARI et al
as 1:2023cv22605
Plaintiff: CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Defendant: NICHOLAS SCUTARI, NETFLIX, THEODORE ROMANKOW and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv21370
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Francisco Grande v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-2840
Petitioner: FRANCISCO ALEXANDER GRANDE
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jose Garcia-Rios v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-2806
Petitioner: JOSE FRANCISCO GARCIA-RIOS
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00149
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Michael DayIn re: Michael Day
as 23-2323
Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL FRANCISCO DAY
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Hugo Mateo v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-1573
Petitioner: HUGO FRANCISCO MATEO
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Brisco et al
as 1:2023mc00085
Defendant: Fredirick Safranko, Marcus Todd Brisco, Yas Cutellum LLC and others
Plaintiff: Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION v. BRISCO et al
as 2:2023mc00033
Defendant: FREDIRICK SAFRANKO, MARCUS TODD BRISCO, YAS CASETLLUM LLC and others
Receiver: KELLY CRAWFORD
Plaintiff: COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?