Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Shin Da Enterprises Inc, et al v. Wei Xiang Yong, et al
as 24-1131
Plaintiff:
SHIN DA ENTERPRISES INC, LIJIAN REN and 446-50 N 6TH ST LLC
Defendant:
WEI XIANG YONG, also known as JOHN WEI, JIAN MEI HE, UIG CONSTRUCTION LLC and others
Shin Da Enterprises Inc, et al v. Wei Xiang Yong, et al
as 23-3099
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHIN DA ENTERPRISES INC, 446-50 N 6TH ST LLC and LIJIAN REN
Defendant / Appellant:
WEI XIANG YONG, also known as JOHN WEI, JIAN MEI HE, UIG CONSTRUCTION LLC and others
Defendant:
G&Y CONTRACTOR INC and YING NAN GAI
Shin Da Enterprises Inc. et al v. XIANG YONG et al
as 2:2021cv03384
Plaintiff:
Shin Da Enterprises Inc., 446-50 N. 6th ST LLC and LIJIAN REN
Defendant:
WEI XIANG YONG, JIAN MEI HE, UIG CONSTRUCTION, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
UNITED MERCHANDISE WHOLESALE, INC. et al v. DIRECT CONTAINERS, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv00617
Plaintiff:
UNITED MERCHANDISE WHOLESALE, INC. and MY IMPORTS USA LLC
Defendant:
DIRECT CONTAINERS, INC. , JIAN YANG ZHANG , MING YANG SOURCING, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Jian Shi v. Attorney General USA
as 16-1737
Petitioner:
JIAN BIN SHI
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jian Lin v. Attorney General United State
as 15-3494
Petitioner:
JIAN HAO LIN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jian Lin v. Attorney General United State
as 13-2439
Petitioner:
JIAN JING LIN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jian Li v. Attorney General United State
as 13-1257
Petitioner:
JIAN QUN LI
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Xiu Ni, et al v. Attorney General United State
as 12-2862
Petitioner:
XIU ZHEN NI and JIAN CHENG LIN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Xiong Huang v. Attorney General United State
as 12-2668
Petitioner:
XIONG JIAN HUANG
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
