Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Morgan v. ManTech International Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01049
Plaintiff:
Anthony Morgan
Defendant:
ManTech International Corporation, Kevin M. Phillips, Richard L. Armitage and others
Kevin Kerr v. Warden Allenwood USP
as 21-2029
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD USP
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN KERR, a/k/a Allah
Kwesi Kerr v. Attorney General United States, et al
as 20-2533
Petitioner:
KWESI OMARI KERR
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Gartor Brown v. Upper Darby Police De, et al
as 20-1452
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARTOR KIKI BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. PHILLIPS, Lieutenant, JEFFERY SOBEL, SGT. CARTER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00285
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
ARCURI et al v. KNORR-BREMSE AG et al
as 2:2018cv01098
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY KERR and PAUL ARCURI
Defendant:
FAIVELEY TRANSPORT NORTH AMERICA INC., NEW YORK AIR BRAKE LLC, KNORR BRAKE COMPANY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
IN RE: RAILWAY INDUSTRY EMPLOYEE NO-POACH ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2018mc00798
Defendant:
KNORR BRAKE COMPANY, FAIVELEY TRANSPORT NORTH AMERICA INC., WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE CO. and others
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY KERR, TIMOTHY BACCO, BRIAN LARA and others
In Re:
IN RE: RAILWAY INDUSTRY EMPLOYEE NO-POACH ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master:
DAVID B. WHITE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
KERR v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (c) 7/4/1776 et al
as 2:2017mc00172
Plaintiff:
BRYAN KERR
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (c) 7/4/1776, ATTORNEY GENERAL(S), ERIC HOLDER and others
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
Type:
Other Statutes
USA v. James Schlosser
as 17-2872
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES KERR SCHLOSSER
KERR v. SOBEL LAW FIRM
as 2:2015cv03500
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH A. KERR
Defendant:
SOBEL LAW FIRM
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
