Cases 1 - 10 of 19
CUETO v. UNIVERSAL MOTORS et al
as 2:2023cv01706
Defendant:
UNIVERSAL MOTORS doing business as SPEED WASH AND TIRES also known as SPEEDWASH & TIRES, INC. trading as UNIVERSAL MOTOR, SPEEDWASH & TIRES, INC., LAROCHE VOYARD and others
Plaintiff:
OSCAR LORA CUETO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1988 Fraud-Motor Vehicle (Odometer)
Franklyn Abreu v. Attorney General United States
as 21-2534
Petitioner:
FRANKLYN YOEL LORA ABREU
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Rafael Lora
as 20-3586
Defendant / Appellant:
RAFAEL LORA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Roy Bordamante v. Hector Lora, et al
as 20-3415
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY SCHAER, Individually an in their official capacities, LUIS GUZMAN, Individually and in their official capacities, RALPH DANNA, Individually and in their official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY BORDAMANTE
Jhon Lora, et al v. Baylor, et al
as 20-3297
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. ARMOND, Sgt. at Monroe County Correctional Facility, LT. BAYLOR, Director of Monroe County Correctional Facility, GARY HAIDLE, Warden of Monroe County Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMAON WEBSTER, JUSTIN COATE, JHON LORA and others
In re: Rafael Lora
as 20-2319
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROBERT D. MARIANI
Petitioner:
In re: RAFAEL LORA
USA v. Rafael Lora
as 20-1791
Defendant / Appellant:
RAFAEL LORA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rafael LoraIn re: Rafael Lora
as 20-1081
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: RAFAEL LORA
Not Yet Classified:
ROBERT D. MARIANI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv02379
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Haines v. Nutrisystem, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00137
Defendant:
Benjamin A. Kirshner, Michael D. Mangan, Michael J. Hagan and others
Plaintiff:
Lora Haines
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
