Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Philips v. Xos, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Mary Philips
Defendant:
Xos, Inc., Dakota Semler, George N. Mattson and others
Moore v. Xos, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jon Moore
Defendant:
Xos, Inc., Dakota Semler, George N. Mattson and others
Thompson v. Immunome, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00995
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
Defendant:
Immunome, Inc., Michael Rapp, Richard Baron and others
Weiss v. Immunome, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00990
Plaintiff:
Steven Weiss
Defendant:
Immunome, Inc., Michael Rapp, Richard Baron and others
David Greco v. Gurbir Grewal, et al
as 21-1035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID M. GRECO
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND PREPAREDNESS, a Cabinet Level Department of the State of New Jersey, DONALD B. GANSKY, Detective Sergeant, Gloucester Township Police Department, JOHN DOE 2-10, (fictitious names) and others
Intervenor Defendant:
JILL S. MAYER, Acting Camden County Prosecutor
Allen Farmer v. Gary M. Lanigan, et al
as 20-3549
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN RIORDAN, F. MARTIN, CAPTAIN ALPHONSO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALLEN J. FARMER
Donald J. Trump for President, et al v. Secretary Commonwealth of PA, et al
as 20-3384
Intervenor Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA VOTERS ALLIANCE, DAVID TORRES, SEAN PARNELL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, DELAWARE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LAWRENCE ROBERTS, DAVID JOHN HENRY and DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT INC
Elfers v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2020cv00213
Defendant:
Richard A. Gonzalez, Brett J. Hart, Edward M. Liddy and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Elfers
Nominal Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc.
COATED FABRICS COMPANY v. MIRLE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008mc00019
Plaintiff:
COATED FABRICS COMPANY
Defendant:
MIRLE CORPORATION, JOEL GOLD, BERYL ZYSKIND and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
