Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Eran Rubinstein, et al v. Bank of America NA, et al
as 23-2410
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERAN RUBINSTEIN and SUSAN M. BOLTZ-RUBINSTEIN
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA NA, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, ANN M. GOLIO and others
Defendant:
ARCH CAPITAL GROUP US INC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
RUBINSTEIN et al v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 2:2022cv04774
Plaintiff:
ERAN RUBINSTEIN and SUSAN M. BOLTZ-RUBINSTEIN
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, ARCH CAPITAL GROUP (US) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hays v. Jacobs et al
as 1:2017cv00603
Plaintiff:
James Hays
Defendant:
Paul E. Jacobs, Barbara T. Alexander, Donald G. Cruickshank and others
Nominal Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Heilicher et al v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha et al
as 2:2013cv06618
Plaintiff:
Matthew Heilicher , Elizabeth Powers Keller , Eric L. Meth and others
Defendant:
NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA, NYK LINE (NORTH AMERICA INC.), WILH WILHELMSEN HOLDING ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
F. RUGGIERO & SONS, INC. et al v. NYK LINE (NORTH AMERICA) INC. et al
as 2:2013cv03306
Plaintiff:
RUSH TRUCK CENTERS OF OHIO, INC., Hudson Gastonia Acquisition, LLC, Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. and others
Defendant:
TOYOFUJI SHIPPING CO. LTD., COMPANIA SUD AMERICANA DE VAPORES S.A., NYK LINE (NORTH AMERICA) INC. and others
In Re:
VEHICLE CARRIER SERVICES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re:Susan M Boltz-Rubinstein
as 11-3170
Debtor - Petitioner:
In re: SUSAN M. BOLTZ-RUBINSTEIN
Defendant - Respondent:
HAGENS BERMAN SCH SOBOL SHAPIRO
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
EDUARDO C ROBRENO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
