Cases 1 - 7 of 7
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS WELFARE FUND OF EASTERN PA v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS WELFARE FUND OF EASTERN PA
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA EX REL LAWRENCE S. KRASNER v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv04645
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA EX REL LAWRENCE S. KRASNER
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al v. SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., MYLAN SPECIALTY L.P. and MYLAN INC.
Defendant:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI S.A., AVENTIS PHARMA S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
KESSELMAN v. SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., INC.
as 2:2009cv05446
Plaintiff:
SHARON KESSELMAN
Defendant:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HILL et al v. SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., INC.
as 2:2009mc00170
Plaintiff:
JANELLE HILL and WILLIAM HILL
Defendant:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion for Enforcement
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. CEPHALON, INC.
as 2:2008cv02141
Intervenor:
PADDOCK LABORATORIES, INC., ASTRAZENECA PLC, URL PHARMA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
CEPHALON, INC.
Respondent:
MATTHEW PIKE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. YOASH GOHIL v. AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2002cv02964
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. YOASH GOHIL
Defendant:
AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC. , AVENTIS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
