Cases 1 - 10 of 41
BALANCED BRIDGE FUNDING LLC v. SEALS
as 2:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
BALANCED BRIDGE FUNDING LLC
Defendant:
RAYMOND B. SEALS
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
BALANCED BRIDGE FUNDING LLC v. SEALS
as 2:2023mc00011
Plaintiff:
BALANCED BRIDGE FUNDING LLC
Defendant:
RAYMOND B. SEALS
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
USA v. Arthur Seale
as 23-1088
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ARTHUR D. SEALE
Franklin v. Doheny et al
as 1:2020cv00053
Defendant:
Lawrence R. Codey, Richard L. Wambold, Jerome A. Peribere and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Franklin, Jr.
Nominal Defendant:
Sealed Air Corporation
SEALE v. ANNUITY FYI et al
as 2:2019cv01146
Defendant:
LIFE FUNDING OPTIONS, KATE SNYDER, UPSTATE LAW GROUP, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL R. SEALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Application of TVM IV GmbH & Co. KG et al.
as 1:2019mc00211
Respondent:
Zeneca Wilmington Inc., MedImmune LLC, AstraZeneca PLC and others
Petitioner:
Cipio Partners Holding I GmbH, TVM IV GmbH & Co. KG and Wellington Partners Nominee Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Arthur SealeIn re: Arthur Seale
as 19-2888
Petitioner:
In re: ARTHUR SEALE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Chris Graham v. Jersey City Police Department, et al
as 19-1464
Defendant / Appellee:
JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER J. SEAL, OFFICER E. REDMOND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRIS L. GRAHAM
CARTER v. CDI CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv03839
Plaintiff:
PETER CARTER
Defendant:
CDI CORP. , JOSEPH L. CARLINI , MICHAEL J. EMMI and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
JURMU v. CDI CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv03787
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. JURMU
Defendant:
CDI CORP. , WALTER R. GARRISON , LAWRENCE C. KARLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
