Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1421 Federal Home Loan Bank Act
In re: Andre Ladika; Luisa Ladika
as 26-1451
Petitioner:
In re: ANDRE LADIKA and LUISA LADIKA
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, Clerk of the Superior Court of NJ, Michelle M. Smith, Esq., NEW JERSEY JUDICIARY, Hon. Glenn A. Grant J.A.D. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Colbert v. NEWREZ, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv00255
Plaintiff:
Talena Colbert, Louis Cancelliere and Martin Litwin
Defendant:
NEWREZ LLC doing business as SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv06691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-2979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
OYENUGA v. SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING et al
as 2:2025cv05531
Plaintiff:
KAZIM O. OYENUGA, Ph.D.
Defendant:
SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING and U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv15756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv05111
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
